Full Proposals will be evaluated first for compliance with administrative requirements. Formal peer review for technical and scientific merit will be conducted by a panel assembled by the Foundation. The review panel will rely on the following evaluation criteria:
Following technical and scientific review and evaluation by the SAB, CRDF’s Research Management Committee will consider the SAB review of each proposal and conduct an additional assessment of scientific merit and applicability of the project delivering solutions to the problems (research priorities). The Research Management Committee’s support of proposals will be recommended for funding approval by the CRDF Board of Directors.
Proposal Confidentiality: Proposals and reviews will not be available to the public, but information from the proposals will be described in the recommendations of the review panel. Please do not include proprietary information in the proposal. If you believe disclosing proprietary information is essential to the evaluation of your proposal, describe the circumstances of your situation in an email and send it to email@example.com;
Award Notification: A list of successful award applicants will be posted at citrusrdf.org.