USDA-ARS Experiment #1. Three potential psyllid management programs were investigated for protecting a new planting of citrus: (1) citrus subjected to an intensive insecticide program (annual chemical cost of $198/acre); (2) citrus interplanted with orange jasmine, with citrus subjected to a moderate insecticide program and jasmine not treated with insecticides (annual chemical cost of $156/acre); and (3) citrus interplanted with jasmine, with citrus subjected to a moderate insecticide program and jasmine regularly treated with insecticides (total annual chemical cost of $213/acre). Trees for the experiment were planted at the USDA-ARS citrus grove during May 2008 in east central Florida near Fort Pierce. Many trees at this grove were already infected by HLB when the new plantings were established, for research purposes most infected trees were not being removed, and also for research purposes much of the grove was only subjected to a minimal psyllid control program. The new citrus plantings for the experiment were therefore in the midst of high psyllid pressure and HLB inoculum. The trees were assayed for HLB quarterly, and trees testing RTPCR-positive for HLB (CT 30) were immediately removed. Numbers of psyllid captured on yellow sticky traps deployed in citrus trees indicated that relatively good psyllid control has been achieved under the intensive insecticide program. Under the reduced insecticide program for citrus interplanted with jasmine, relatively poor control of psyllids has been achieved in citrus whether jasmine was treated or not treated with pesticide (although psyllid levels in citrus were lower in plots where jasmine was treated). Numbers of psyllid on traps deployed in jasmine were frequently greater in plots where jasmine was not treated with insecticide. Lady beetles (species known to be predators of the psyllid) were relatively abundant in jasmine plants whether jasmine was treated or not treated with pesticide. Although less than 1% of the trees under each treatment tested positive for HLB 12 months after planting, during August 2010 (27 months after planting), the percentage of trees infected by HLB under treatments 1, 2 and 3 averaged 27, 33, and 30%, respectively. Based on these results, planting new citrus trees and getting them to a producing stage is difficult if HLB is endemic in the surrounding area and psyllids are not controlled across this area. USDA-ARS Experiment #2. Three ACP control programs are being compared for preventing HLB in a block of young, HLB-free citrus (Val on Carr): 1) citrus under a relaxed insecticide program (annual chemical cost of $173/acre); 2) citrus receiving monthly insecticide applications (annual chemical cost of $198/acre); and 3) citrus treated once every three weeks with spray oil [PureSpray Foliar (470, C27) and PureSpray Green (435, C23)] from February through November (plus a December application of Danitol) (annual chemical cost of $76/acre). There are two replications of each treatment. The experiment started in August 2009. In January 2010, 0%, 0.3% and 0.3% of the trees tested HLB positive under programs 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In July 2010, 25%, 7% and 10% of the trees tested positive under the three treatments. Infected trees are not removed in this experiment. UF Experiments – Updates on these experiments will be presented in the next quarterly report.
The response from growers to the extension program funded by this project has been excellent as demonstrated by wide adoption of practices we have developed and promoted such as area wide dormant sprays and ACP monitoring using tap samples For example, more than 70,000 acres were sprayed at least once by air and much of the rest by ground during cooperative dormant sprays in the SW Florida “Gulf” region. Application data were provided by the aerial applicators and survey data by Hendry County Cooperative Extension. Field ACP counts to evaluate the sprays were provided by growers and the FDOACS-DPI ACP sampling team trained under this project. Virtually all commercial groves in the region are participating in this program. As a result, the overall psyllid population in the area has steadily declined since the program was initiated in 2008. We are presently gearing up with Gulf Citrus Growers Association, FDOACS-DPI-CHRP, and Hendry County Cooperative Extension for the 2010-11 season with every expectation of another successful year . Detailed information about the success of this effort can be found in the upcoming (October 2010) issue of Citrus Industry Magazine. This practice has stimulated area wide management efforts in other citrus growing regions of the state and the present “CHMA” program of which we are a part. Another successful extension effort has been to encourage the adoption of the “stem tap” sample and other techniques for monitoring ACP populations. An extension (EDIS) document describing ACP sampling techniques (ENY857/IN867) is in-press. Our present management plan is based on four principles: (1) insecticidal sprays during winter targeting adult ACP to reduce the population reproducing in spring flush (2) the use of a rapid and reliable psyllid monitoring system to guide timing of insecticidal control during the growing season (3) conservation and augmentation of biological control agents (4) constant testing of insecticides in the lab and field, including techniques such as low-volume sprays and application timing. This grant has 5 objectives: (1) evaluate efficiency of potential ACP control techniques in cooperation with growers (2) develop efficient monitoring methods for ACP (3) accelerate testing of new chemistries and techniques for ACP management (4) evaluate the economic component of the comprehensive program and (5) provide an information bridge between researchers, growers, and industry. The experiments described below relate primarily to objectives 1, 3, and 5. (1) A large-scale (70-acre) timing trial involving a standard dormant spray (Mustang), compared to applications of aldicarb before and after spring flush with and without application of spirotetramat directly on the spring flush. All treatments successfully maintained populations lower than the control until May and treatments that included spirotetramat were effective until July. (2) A trial comparing low vs. high volume applications of spirotetramat was initiated on 9/30/10 (3) Bioassays and extensive field testing (5 trials) of systemic insecticides in a newly planted 5-acre block of “Hamlin” orange on 802 rootstock at our center. Materials tested include a new active ingredient, cyazypyr (cyantraniliprole) [DuPont, Wilmington, DE], which showed excellent promise in our preliminary lab bioassays as an important addition to an arsenal of soil-applied systemic insecticides. This is important as systemic options will be limited to the neonicotinoids imidacloprid and thiamethoxam with the loss of Temik next year. (4) Three more insecticide testing trials are currently under way. All our trial results are available to the public through grower presentations and our website, www,imok.ufl.edu/entlab. All results are published the year they are completed in the Entomological Society of America’s annual “Arthropod Management Tests” (www.entsoc.org). Six such reports on citrus pest management were published in 2009 alone.
The main objective of this project was to evaluate the potential of both ground and aerial low volume (LV) insecticidal application to manage Asian citrus psyllid (ACP). We have been evaluating aerial and ground applications of various insecticidal products including horticultural mineral oils (HMO)at different times, concentrations, and conditions. During the last two years, thanks to this project, LV applications have become the norm during the dormant season in Southwest Florida. More than 73,000 acres in 48 groves were sprayed by air during the last area wide cooperative effort in the winter of 2010. In 2009, we compared a Proptec rotary spinning disk atomizer P-400D with a modified London Fogger 18-20 to determine which machine was more effective. We demonstrated that the Proptec was more effective in reducing an already low ACP population using frequent applications of undiluted 435 horticultural mineral oil (HMO) at 2 gallons per acre (GPA) applied every 2 to 4 weeks depending on ACP populations. An additional advantage of the Proptec is the ability to apply higher volumes to include nutrient mixes with the oil. Currently, we are conducting four new trials. In the first trial, we are using the Proptec to spray a mixture of micronutrients that has shown promise in previous experiments. The mixture has been modified to be sprayed every two weeks for 7 months at 10 GPA, which includes 2 gals of HMO within the mixture for ACP control. The trial was designed as a randomized complete block (RCB) with four replications in a 40-acre block of ‘pineapple’ oranges in Glades Co. that had not received a dormant spray and was expected to have high ACP populations. ACP was monitored on alternate weeks using the stem tap sampling. Contrary to expectations, ACP populations have been low, although the accumulated number of ACP is less in the treated plots (3.4′ 1.1 ACP x day) than in untreated plots (6.3’2.1 ACP x day). We are also tracking the development of the disease over time in response to the treatments. An earlier sample analyzed by the PCR laboratory at the Southwest Florida Research and Education Center (SWFREC) indicated an initial HLB infection rate in the block of 11%. Recent samples have been submitted for PCR analysis to test for treatment effects. In a second trial employing an RCB design with three replicates, we are evaluating the effects of frequent (every two weeks) of 2% (v/v) HMO sprayed at 100 GPA with an airblast sprayer in an 85-acre block of organic ‘Valencia’ oranges in Charlotte Co. However, applications have not produced observable differences between the treated and the untreated plots, although ACP populations have been extremely low. A third trial is evaluating coverage, deposition, and absorption is underway in a 16-acre block of ‘Valencia’ oranges in Collier Co. Applications of a micronutrient package using the Proptec sprayer @ 10 GPA every two weeks are being compared to an air blast sprayer applying 100 GPA three times a year during the summer, fall, and spring flush. Both treatments used the same overall amount of active ingredient. Leaf samples have been collected and are being analyzed for absorption of the micronutrients at the Foliar Analysis Laboratory at the University of Florida’s Everglades Research and Education Center. In a fourth trial we are evaluating effects of spray volume on activity of spirotetramat + 2% oil applied at 10 oz/ac. We are comparing 5, 10, 40 and 120 GPA of total solution to evaluate the efficacy of this product at low and high volumes of application. The two lower volume rates are being applied with the Proptec by varying pump speed and the two higher rates are being applied with a speed sprayer by changing nozzle types. After two weeks, first indications show no significant differences among volumes.
We have just recently received notice of awarding of funds and that the subcontracts are in place. We have initiated further behavioral studies in the laboratory to better understand psyllid responses to traps. We also are developing prototype traps components using an autocad program so that we can enable private companies to construct the traps for field testing.
We received notice of the awarding of subcontract funds and that the subcontracts were in place on April 29, 2011. We have initiated further behavioral studies in the laboratory to better understand psyllid responses to traps. We also are developing prototype traps components using an autocad program so that we can enable private companies to construct the prototype traps for field testing. Following the long period of down time with the subcontracts we were unable to maintain viable colonies of psyllids with which to work. To date the lab colonies have been restored and we are seeking a lab technician to continue more intensive lab bioassays. Do to the lost time we will need another year to complete the project.
The potato/tomato psyllid, Bactericerca cockerelli (B. cockerelli), is a very important plant pest and also vectors of phloem-limited bacterium Candidatus Liberibacter psyllaurous (solanacearum), which is associated with zebra chip disease of potatoes. The B. cockerelli – Ca. L. solanacearum interaction very much resembles that of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri and Ca. L. asiaticus ‘ the latter being the causal agent of HLB. Because the B. cockerelli – Ca. L. solanacearum complex is associated with herbaceous as opposed to woody plants for HLB, we used it as a more facile and simple model system to assess RNA interference potential as a potential strategy for assessing RNAi effects in psyllids. We generated specific dsRNAs and siRNAs in vitro, and expressed anti-psyllid sequences in plants by using plant-infecting RNA viruses. We were able to detect molecular hallmarks of RNAi activity in psyllids, including mRNA reduction and generation of specific siRNAs. We also observed mortality in psyllids after feeding on artificial diets containing specific effector RNAs, and after feeding on plants infected with recombinant plant viruses. We are further testing additional sequences and transgenic plants for inducing RNAi effects in B. cockerelli with hope to apply this towards the Asian citrus psyllid.
Progress made so far: 1. Soil Survey: soil heterogeneities across the field as well as with soil depth (layering) have been quantified in both study sites (oranges orchard, Orange Cove, CA, and mandarin site, Strathmore, CA) through an extensive soil survey. Soil core samples were taken from depth 0-300 cm in 8 location across each orchard and were characterized. This task was completed 2. Root zone monitoring: 6 sets of soil moisture and soil water potential sensors were installed in 6 locations, each location in 5 different depths, in the root zone of the trees in both oranges and mandarin orchards. They are recording data on soil water status following irrigation, rainfall, and root water uptake. Installation was completed and data collection will continue throughout the project. 3. Deep soil monitoring: 12 sets of soil water potential sensors and nitrate samplers were installed at 230 and 260 cm deep in 12 locations across the field in each orchard for monitoring leaching of water and nitrate across the field. Installation was completed and data collection will continue throughout the project. 4. We evaluated the performance of soil moisture sensors (water capacitance sensors) against actual measurements of soil suction and water availability for tree roots and made suggestion on how to best use the data from these sensors depending on the soil type. Our results and our recommendations were demonstrated to a group of growers on site. Plan for the remainders of the year: 1. Data collection on water and nitrate from root zone as well as below the root zone of trees from all locations that are being monitored. 2. Root distribution of selected trees will be investigated in both orchards. This data will reveal where in soil profile the roots are taking up water and nutrients. 3. All the collected data on water and nitrate and root study data will be used to build up and calibrate models of water and nutrients movement in every orchard. This will allow scenario analysis for recommendations on irrigation and fertigation practices. B. Ahmad Moradi 106 Veihmeyer hall Department of Land, Air and Water Resources University of California Davis 1 Shields Ave. Davis CA 95616 Phone (530)752-1210 Fax (530)752-0256 email: amoradi@ucdavis.edu
Our project is examining phloem gene expression changes in response to CLas infection in HLB-susceptible sweet orange and HLB-resistant Poncirus and Carrizo (a sweet orange – Poncirus cross). We are using a recently developed methodology for woody crops that allows gene expression profiling of phloem tissues. The method leverages a translating ribosome affinity purification strategy (called TRAP) to isolate and characterize translating mRNAs from phloem specific tissues. Our approach is unlike other gene expression profiling methods in that it only samples gene transcripts that are actively being transcribed into proteins and is thus a better representation of active cellular processes than total cellular mRNA. Sweet orange, and HLB-resistant Poncirus and Carrizo (sweet orange x Poncirus) will be transformed to express the tagged ribosomal proteins under the control of characterized phloem-specific promoters; tagged ribosomal proteins under control of the nearly ubiquitous CaMV 35S promoter will be used as a control. Transgenic plants will be exposed to CLas+ or CLas- ACP and leaves sampled 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks later. Ribosome-associated mRNA will be sequenced and analyzed to identify differentially regulated genes at each time point and between each citrus cultivar. Comparisons of susceptible and resistant phloem cell responses to CLas will identify those genes that are differentially regulated during these host responses. Identified genes will represent unique phloem specific targets for CRISPR knockout or overexpression, permitting the generation of HLB-resistant variants of major citrus cultivars.
This is the first year, 3nd quarter progress report; our grant started December 1, 2018. In the last three months, the post-doctoral researcher, Tami Collum, has started optimizing nucleic acid extraction protocols for citrus. For objective 6 (Additional Approach: Phloem limited citrus tristeza virus vectors will be used to express the His-FLAG-tagged ribosomal protein in healthy and CLas infected citrus) Dr. Dawson’s lab has all necessary constructs and has moved many of them into citrus. CTV-infected plants will soon be ready for shipment to Maryland. Again, the majority of our efforts in the 3nd quarter were focused on objective 2 (production of transgenic citrus lines). The Stover lab has performed Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of seedling epicotyls from all three citrus genotypes indicated in the grant (Carrizo, Poncirus and Hamlin sweet orange) with the His-FLAG tagged RPL18 (ribosomal protein L18) under the 35S promoter and all three phloem promoters pSUC2, pSUL and p396ss. Carrizo transgenic plants with three promoters are already acclimatized in the greenhouse: p35S::HF-RPL18 (12 plants), pSUL::HF-RPL18 (21 plants), and p396ss::HF-RPL18 (30 plants), with many plants >25 cm and suitable for taking cuttings for replication. Seven plants transformed with each promoter were evaluated for presence (PCR) and expression (RT-qPCR) of the HF-RPL18 gene, and 100% of the plants are expressing the gene. The newly transformed Carrizo with the pSUC2 promoter has been transferred to greenhouse and will be evaluated soon. Putative transgenic plants of Poncirus harboring the 35S::HF-RPL18 (12 plants) and pSUL::HF-RPL18 (10 plants) were moved to the soil. Poncirus plants with constructions p396ss::HF-RPL18 and pSUC2::HF-RPL18 are still in rooting medium (16 and 49 plantlets, respectively). Hamlin transformation was intensified in this quarter and many shoots have being transferred to rooting media, and one plant to soil. Since Hamlin has a much lower transformation efficiency, some transformations were repeated and also cotyledons have being used as a new transformation target explant for this genotype. Carrizo plants expressing the HF-RPL18 gene will be replicated and transferred to Ft. Detrick in the next quarter.
1. Please state project objectives and what work was done this quarter to address them: Objective 1. Assessing tree growth and absence of psyllids and HLB disease symptoms (including CLas bacteria titer) under protective covering (i.e., IPC). We are monitoring fruit development and retention for the second crop to be harvested next spring in the Valencia trees that were uncovered in August 2020 and had their first crop in Spring 2021. Fruit drop is starting in the non-covered HLB-infected trees. However, in the trees that were in IPC and uncovered last August, fruit drop is not happening, so far. We also found more fruit set in these trees that were uncovered last August, as compared to the non-covered trees. Fruit is also significantly larger this year, continuing the trend we observed last year.With regard to our trials with mandarin varieties, SugarBelle trees show very good growth and fruit set with no differences in growth between IPC or no-IPC conditions. Once we remove IPCs by the end of this year, we will assess fruit yield and quality as well. In contrast, Tango trees are growing significantly larger under the IPCs, as compared to non-covered trees. We will also assess fruit yield and quality in these trees when we remove the covers. Finally, Early Pride trees are not performing well under the IPCs. Typical twig dieback in this variety is exacerbated inside the covers, and trees are significantly smaller. Based on these observations, we do not recommend IPCs for Early Pride mandarin trees. Objective 2. Assessment of alternative netting approaches including targeted, alternated and patterned setup of IPC in groves for more cost-effective protection. Although HLB-positive, we are seeing lower bacterial levels (higher Ct values) in internal rows of uncovered trees planted in an alternate pattern, which suggests that internal rows in a grove may have some protection if external tree rows are covered by IPCs. These studies need to be continued and refined to clearly determine if we can take advantage of the ‘cross-protection’ as well as the edge effect. Objective 3. Monitoring the transition from vegetative to reproductive stage in the covered and non-covered trees. As stated in our last quarterly report and in Objective 1 of this report, we are assessing fruit development, and did not find significant differences in fruit set as compared to non-covered trees, but fruits inside IPCs seem to be larger. This is promising, since IPC protection could potentially be prolonged to get the trees well into the productive age, producing high quality fruit, as we have shown in our last report. By applying brassinosteroids as a combined treatment with IPCs we expect to prolong tree health further, and produce a commercial-size good quality fruit crop. Objective 4. Comparing IPC with CUPS-like systems. We are now monitoring fruit growth inside the CUPS to later compare with IPCs. We are also monitoring fruit drop and are ready to start with quality assessment in Tango, as fruit growth seems to be well advanced inside the CUPS and ready to reach commercial maturity. Outreach for this quarter:-Alferez, F., Albrecht, U, Gaire, S., Batuman, O., Qureshi, J., Zekri, M. Individual Protective Covers (IPCs) for young tree protection from the HLB vector, the Asian citrus psyllid. EDIS, accepted, in press. -Alferez, F, Batuman, O, Gaire, S, Albrecht, U, Qureshi, J. Assessing spatial patterns of IPCs deployment in young citrus. Citrus Industry, August, 2021. -Gaire, S, Alferez, F, Albrecht, U. Horticultural attributes of SugarBelle, Tango and Early Pride mandarin trees grafted on two different rootstocks grown with and without individual protective covers (IPCs). ASHS Annual meeting. August 5-9, 2021, Denver CO. -Alferez, F and Batuman, O. Individual Protective Covers (IPCs) and their patterned use for young tree protection. CRAFT Growers meeting, August, 2021 2. Please state what work is anticipated for next quarter: Next quarter will be the final quarter of this project. Although we anticipate finishing most of the work in this project, some of our results warrant continued research that can be of great interest in providing real guidance on what can be done to keep trees healthy at least for several years into their productive age.Objective 1. We will continue with regular work pertaining horticultural/pathological parameters in all plots. We will remove the covers in the mandarin trials and will assess fruit yield and quality. When new funding become available, we plan to start brassinosteroids treatments, as we already know that this treatment can prolong health of citrus trees by delaying HLB infection and reducing incidence of other pests and diseases, which potentially can result in better fruit yield and quality at least in the mid-term. The real positive impact of this combined treatment, and for how long can we benefit from it, remains to be determined.Objective 2. We will continue collecting data on psyllid population and HLB incidence in the different netting layouts (i.e., pattern). We will confirm if the trend that we observed in Ct values is maintained or changes over time.Objectives 3 and 4. We will continue collecting data on fruit growth and maturation for the second season of deficit irrigation treatments. We will also monitor for early fruit drop if occurs, and will assess fruit quality and yield. 3. Please state budget status (underspend or overspend, and why): We continue on track with activities and spending. Budgeted amounts for salaries are being spent as predicted.
(863) 956-8817
(863) 956-5894
700 Experiment Station Road
Lake Alfred, FL 33850
Email Us
